Post by anik4200 on Feb 18, 2024 6:50:05 GMT -5
The matter will allow the STF, in light of constitutional principles, to analyze the limits, defects or defects that need to be improved in Brazilian legislation, in accordance with the Constitution and in accordance with the protection of privacy, intimacy and the honor of everyone on the internet. "We have seen, not only in Brazil, but throughout the world, the hate campaign against democracy, against institutions. This is a collective attack," he said. According to the minister, the objective is to determine, based on the Constitution, what constitutes a crime and abuse. Fux also stated that, in Brazil, the dignity of the human person is one of the foundations of the Republic, therefore, its protection and possible liability for violations are very important. He highlighted that, when judging the cases, the STF Plenary will have the opportunity to hear entities present at the hearing about the problem so that it is possible to reach a uniform solution.
The minister warned about the issue of predatory judicialization, which overcrowds the courts, and stated that self-regulation in the area can be a filter. "But when deciding the case we have to choose a model", he highlighted. Toffoli also stated that self-regulation is always welcome, because it leaves only exceptions to the Judic Special Phone Number Data iary. He added that members of Parliament have already expressed their opinion about the importance of the STF's judgment for the legislation being discussed in the National Congress. The minister also said that, in theory, it is possible for the court to make some type of decision that interprets the Marco Civil da Internet in order to provide the greatest possible protection, always in its role as guardian of the Constitution, individual rights and guarantees and of the democratic rule of law.
With information from the STF press office.ElectoralJudiciaryPolicy By changing the interpretation of the anti-anonymity rule of the Elections Law (Law 9,504/1997) to fine federal deputy Nikolas Ferreira (PL-MG) for disseminating fake news, the Superior Electoral Court compensated for a deficiency in legislation on the subject, according to lawyers electoralists interviewed by the electronic magazine Consultor Jurídica . Reproduction/Facebook Nikolas Ferreira was fined R$30,000 for spreading fake news in the elections Facebook The TSE decided this Tuesday (28/3), by majority vote, to make the understanding of article 57-D of the law more flexible, which punishes anonymous demonstrations in an electoral context on the internet, to maintain the R$30,000 fine for the deputy , who was not under anonymity when he published disinformative content during last year's presidential election. When deciding, Minister Alexandre de Moraes, rapporteur of the matter and president of the TSE, argued that, in previous elections, the court understood that article 57-D has restricted application to cases of anonymity.
The minister warned about the issue of predatory judicialization, which overcrowds the courts, and stated that self-regulation in the area can be a filter. "But when deciding the case we have to choose a model", he highlighted. Toffoli also stated that self-regulation is always welcome, because it leaves only exceptions to the Judic Special Phone Number Data iary. He added that members of Parliament have already expressed their opinion about the importance of the STF's judgment for the legislation being discussed in the National Congress. The minister also said that, in theory, it is possible for the court to make some type of decision that interprets the Marco Civil da Internet in order to provide the greatest possible protection, always in its role as guardian of the Constitution, individual rights and guarantees and of the democratic rule of law.
With information from the STF press office.ElectoralJudiciaryPolicy By changing the interpretation of the anti-anonymity rule of the Elections Law (Law 9,504/1997) to fine federal deputy Nikolas Ferreira (PL-MG) for disseminating fake news, the Superior Electoral Court compensated for a deficiency in legislation on the subject, according to lawyers electoralists interviewed by the electronic magazine Consultor Jurídica . Reproduction/Facebook Nikolas Ferreira was fined R$30,000 for spreading fake news in the elections Facebook The TSE decided this Tuesday (28/3), by majority vote, to make the understanding of article 57-D of the law more flexible, which punishes anonymous demonstrations in an electoral context on the internet, to maintain the R$30,000 fine for the deputy , who was not under anonymity when he published disinformative content during last year's presidential election. When deciding, Minister Alexandre de Moraes, rapporteur of the matter and president of the TSE, argued that, in previous elections, the court understood that article 57-D has restricted application to cases of anonymity.